11.07.2009

Bella Feldman and JP Long :: Dialogue

San Francisco Bay Area artists, Bella Feldman and JP Long were recently featured in a local blog citing their exhibition at Sculpture Site Gallery (view the blog link). What's the big deal and why would I want to talk about them? Well, for one, Bella Feldman is the pre-eminent woman sculptor working with blown glass and combinations of glass and metal, and even wood. Her works, large scale, sinuous in their grandeur, command a sine qua non attention. JP Long, her assistant, and protege of 9 years works in a similar style. Combined, an exhibition of their works can only be arresting.

7.15.2009

Gallery in Wikipedia legal threat

Georgina Spencer, Duchess of Devonshire ascribed to Sir Joshua Reynolds, circa 1759-1761. © National Portrait Gallery
Work by Sir Joshua Reynolds was among those uploaded to Wikipedia

The National Portrait Gallery (NPG) is threatening legal action after 3,300 images from its website were uploaded to online encyclopaedia Wikipedia.

A contributor to the popular site, Derrick Coetzee, breached English copyright laws by posting images from the gallery's collection, the NPG said.

But photographs of works of art are not protected by copyright in the US, where Mr Coetzee and Wikipedia are based.

The NPG said the breach undermines its £1m project to digitise its collection.

So far, 60,000 hi-resolution photographs of paintings held by the NPG have been added to its website for use by the general public.

Sir Joshua Reynolds' portrait of Georgiana Duchess of Devonshire as a child, and a portrait of Victorian photographer Julia Margaret Cameron were among those uploaded to Wikipedia by Mr Coetzee.

Huge costs

In a statement, the NPG said: "The gallery is very concerned that potential loss of licensing income from the high-resolution files threatens its ability to reinvest in its digitization programme and so make further images available.

"It is one of the gallery's primary purposes to make as much of the collection available as possible for the public to view.

"Digitisation involves huge costs including research, cataloguing, conservation and highly-skilled photography. Images then need to be made available on the gallery website as part of a structured and authoritative database."

The NPG said it asked Wikipedia to remove the images, but did not get a response, and issued the letter to Mr Coetzee as their "only course of action".

Permission

The gallery stressed that it hoped to avoid taking any further legal action.

The NPG said while it would be "happy" for the website to use low-resolution images, Mr Coetzee found a way to get around their software and download hi-resolution images without permission.

Writing on Wikipedia in May, Mr Coetzee said it was "no longer possible to obtain high-resolution images from NPG" in the manner he did.

Mr Coetzee also uploaded the legal letter from the NPG, sent by London solicitors Farrar and Co, to Wikipedia.

He said he reproduced the letter to "enable public discourse on the issue". He added that he was taking legal advice.

-BBC News, Wednesday, 15 July 2009 14:04 UK

7.14.2009

Michael Jackson

Last week was a flurry of adieux to Michael Jackson - for the memories that growing up brought to those of us over 40, for the inspiration that he gave to everyone under 40, and most of all for the legacy of his music, his character, and all the life he gave to our news with the goings on of his lifestyle. So, it's not surprising that the L.A. Times' Deborah Netburn did a little online snapshot of the art he inspired. From Jeff Koons sculptures in the Eli Broad collection at the LACMA to Madame Tussaud's Wax Museum to posters featuring him with such icons as Albert Einstein, La Gioconda and George Washington, he was, if anything, prescient about his place in popular culture. As Netburn states, "It's not Michael Jackson the artist but Michael Jackson as art. The self-proclaimed King of Pop served as an inspiration for plastic figurines, decorative car hoods and this sculpture, titled "Michael Jackson and Bubbles," by Jeff Koons. (image: Broad Contemporary Art Museum at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art.)

Voila: http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/arts/la-hm-michaeljacksonart-pictures,0,866295.photogallery?index=1

7.13.2009

Back to Earth

by Alexandra Wolfe
The hedge fund bust takes a toll on artist Richard Prince. Slideshow VIEW SLIDESHOW
The fat years were very fat for the artists who catered to the hedge fund set.

Damien Hirst, famed for the $17 million pickled shark and the $100 million diamond-encrusted skull, was able to unload $200 million worth of works, even as the world economy came crashing down in October. Jeff Koons, creator of the stainless-steel, one-ton Balloon Dog and a $5.6 million porcelain statue of Michael Jackson, had waiting lists that grew as his prices swelled. But few of the half-dozen art-world darlings who profited from the reflected gleam of hedge fund riches could top Richard Prince.

Famous for “re-photography”—photographing existing photos and selling them as his own—Prince, in the early part of the decade, was a well-established, if sometimes controversial, artist. His work sold in the five-figure to low-six-figure range, and he was represented by New York’s Gladstone Gallery, a top-tier venue. To the larger public, he was mainly known as the guy who re-photographed Marlboro Man ads and sold them as art, or as the artist who re-photographed a famous nude photo taken of actress Brooke Shields when she was a little girl. (The original photographer sold the image for $300; a Prince re-photograph of the image brought $151,000 at Christie’s.)

Yet once Prince was discovered by collectors in the hedge fund set, including Adam Sender, Daniel Loeb, and David Ganek, he became not just a bad boy but a bad boy with some very motivated patrons. Prince’s outlaw status appealed to the hedge funders, as did the potential gains to be had by flipping his paintings. Starting in 2005, his prices rose so quickly that some in the art world suspected hedge fund managers of bidding up the works as a game—seeing how high prices could soar before cashing out. ( View a slidehow detailing how some art has fallen sharply in value.)

And soar they did. In 2005, one of the images in Prince’s Cowboy series became the first work of photography to command more than $1 million at auction. Pieces with estimates of $250,000 went for $1 million. The Guggenheim Museum in New York, where David Ganek is a trustee, gave the 59-year-old Prince a retrospective in 2007, which jacked up prices even more. Last summer, one of his famous Nurse paintings (he scans covers of pulp-fiction novels and transfers the images onto canvas) sold for $8.4 million, almost 28 times as much as a work from the same series brought at a Christie’s auction in 2005.

But with his finance-world collectors in free fall, where does that leave Prince? Not in an ideal place. The prices of some of his works are down as much as 50 percent, and some unexpected pieces are showing up on the block. The president of the Guggenheim Museum’s board of trustees, Jennifer Stockman, sold two at auction in November, and indicted lawyer Marc Dreier recently unloaded the coveted 1980 photograph Untitled (Four Women With Hats). A group of Prince works is at the center of a dispute between one of his longtime collectors, CNET founder Halsey Minor, and Christie’s auction house. (Minor contends that the works plummeted in value after being consigned to Christie’s for a private sale that never materialized.) Prince has also been slapped with a lawsuit by French photographer ​Patrick Cariou, who charged the artist with copyright infringement.

So has Prince’s bubble burst? He declined to be interviewed for this story, though he did send an email from
St. Barts, where he was vacationing. “I don’t have any real thoughts about the market,” he wrote. “It’s another way of ‘judging’ art. That’s what people do.” He added, “I never planned to have one of my paintings sell for over $8 million.” In a follow-up email, Prince denied a rumor that he is trying to stop collectors from putting his works up for auction. “I can’t stop it if a collector wants to sell something of mine, and I can’t help it if a collector wants to bid on something of mine,” he wrote. “It’s flattering when a ‘nurse’ or a ‘cowboy’ or a ‘joke’ painting realizes a big price, but I’m not interested in consigning any of my work directly to an auction house.”

Of course, other hedge fund favorites are in a similar boat. Japanese artist Takashi Murakami, known mostly for his cartoonlike, anime-influenced paintings, used to sell pieces from his Flower Ball series for more than
$1 million, but at a recent Christie’s auction, Flower Ball (Brown) made less than $600,000. Jeff Koons’ work has been selling for about half what it once auctioned for—when it is bid on at all—and Damien Hirst has laid off staff in the wake of his big auction last fall. Art sales in general are down; Christie’s reported an 11 percent drop in sales volume in 2008. A share of Sotheby’s stock, which peaked at nearly $60 in late 2007, traded at just above $6 in March.

Prince’s misfortune is that he embodies the market’s downturn more than his contemporaries. While smaller Prince works are still selling at auction, and privately through his new dealer, Larry Gagosian, some of the bigger-ticket items are hurting. When Christie’s put Lake Resort NurseThe Taming of Nurse Conway—garnered no bids at all. Neither did a Prince painting from his Joke series at a Phillips de Pury auction in London in October. Prince, via email, said he’s sanguine. “I drive a beat-up Volvo. I keep time with a $15 watch. I wear dungarees and T-shirts. I eat Cheetos and watch the Playboy channel.” In his free time, he added, “I’m learning to fly my own plane.” on the block in November, it took in $3.3 million, well below both the low estimate and the auction house’s guarantee of $5 million. Another Nurse work—The Taming of Nurse Conway—garnered no bids at all. Neither did a Prince painting from his Joke series at a Phillips de Pury auction in London in October. Prince, via email, said he’s sanguine. “I drive a beat-up Volvo. I keep time with a $15 watch. I wear dungarees and T-shirts. I eat Cheetos and watch the Playboy channel.” In his free time, he added, “I’m learning to fly my own plane.”

More From Portfolio
slideshows How Low Can You Go?
Even established masters are bringing basement bids at auction this year.
No Banking on Art
Art financing is drying up, putting pressure on an already wavering market.

5.06.2009

Modern masters - is it time to revisit collections?

This morning's New York Times published the following article about the demise of desire for artworks by modern masters, such as Giacometti and Picasso (see: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/06/arts/design/06auction.html), as perceived by their inability to sell as successfully as they have in years past. At a time when contemporary art is enjoying a surge of well-deserved attention, with works by luminaries such as Jeff Koons and Damien Hirst, competing in the millions of dollars bracket, so other urban artists such as Shepard Fairey and Ellis Gallagher, and the argument that begs the question: Is it time for collectors to look at the contemporary artists as a serious investment option?

4.30.2009

Women in Video - New York Times Art Review

SheTube: Female Voices on the Small Screen

2.14.2009

Wikipedia Art

Scott Kildall and Nathaniel Stern invite you to participate in an intervention on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia Art is art that anyone can edit.

We've posted a new entry on Wikipedia called "Wikipedia Art." This page is the manifestation of the work of art; alter its composition, and you become a collaborator in the art's formation. The catch is that Wikipedia, the world's free and editable encyclopedia, has enforced standards of quality and verifiability. All Wikipedia articles, and each fact written in them, must cite “credible” external sources: interviews, blogs, or articles in “trustworthy” media institutions. Wikipedia Art is birthed, survives and transforms itself through public performance and communal intervention. It is continuously reconstituted and redefined in a participant-driven write+cite+edit process that we call "performative citation."

Wikipedia Art MUST BE written about extensively both on- and off-line, and these writings will in turn be included as part of the work, on its Wikipedia page. This serves the dual purpose of verifying the piece - which is considered controversial by those in the Wikipedia community, and may occasionally be removed from the site - as well as transforming it over time.

Here are three ways you can join the collaboration:
  1. Write a text, blog entry, essay or any other form of thoughts about the project;
  2. Edit the Wikipedia page itself, citing a published text (even your own!);
  3. Pass along this call for participation to others

The link to the project page is http://www.wikipediaart.org
Initial interviews and essays: Wikipedia Art — a virtual fireside chat: http://www.myartspace.com/blog/2009/02/wikipedia-art-virtual-fireside-chat.html
WikiPedia art? -- by Patrick Lichty http://blog.furtherfield.org/?q=node/267